There has been much ado recently about whether social media platforms are, or should be gatekeepers of information, thereby acting as arbiters of truth. Currently, platforms like Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, WeChat, Weibo and Tiktok perform several functions that arguably do install them squarely in the gatekeeper seat:
- Content moderation – requires judgment by these platforms, to determine what should be kept or banned from their users
- Feed algorithms – that determine what a user sees. Each user has a unique feed that reflects what the algorithm decides that individual should see
- Government filters – in parts of the world such as China, the government has a significant level of control, with the agreement of these ostensibly private platforms, regarding what should and should not be allowed and/or shared
Altogether, that would seem to give platforms a material amount of control over ‘truth,’ as its shared on their platform.
If we accept this argument, then the next issue of concern is who and how those powerful platformsare governed. For the largest such entities, the founders have outsized singular control through dual share structures, there are government controls, or independent board members that aren’t viably independent.
As an example, the board of Tencent, one of the most influential such platforms globally (they own c.12+% of Snapchat, amongst others), four out of their five ‘independents’ have either served for 15 years or longer, or are government party officials. As for Snap itself, 95 percent of the company’s voting power rests with its co-founders Evan Spiegel and Bobby Murphy.
Yet all these platforms are publicly listed companies, which implies that other shareholders and investors are along for the economic ride, but not the decision making – let alone rule making- one.
So who are the arbiters of truth for billions of users around the world? It seems that the answer is: a couple of handfuls of private individuals and authoritarian governments.
US upends global digital tax plans after pulling out of talks with Europe
The US has thrown into disarray plans for a new global tax framework for technology companies after suspending talks with European countries — and warning them of retaliatory measures if they press ahead with their own taxes. In a letter to four European finance ministers seen by the Financial Times, US Treasury secretary Steven…
Not just nipples: how Facebook’s AI struggles to detect misinformation
“It’s much easier to build an AI system that can detect a nipple than it is to determine what is linguistically hate speech.”The Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg made that comment in 2018 when he was discussing how the company tackles content that is deemed inappropriate or, in Facebook terms, judged to be violating community standards…
U.S. Watched George Floyd Protests in 15 Cities Using Aerial Surveillance
The Department of Homeland Security deployed helicopters, airplanes and drones over 15 cities where demonstrators gathered to protest the death of George Floyd, logging at least 270 hours of surveillance, far more than previously revealed, according to Customs and Border Protection data…
The Global Implications of “Re-education” Technologies in Northwest China
Since May 2014, when Chinese Communist Party Secretary Zhang Chunxian announced the People’s War on Terror in the Uighur region, Chinese technology firms have received billions of dollars in Chinese state capital to build a comprehensive Muslim “re-education” system in Northwest China. Over the same period of time…
Tesla to buy cobalt from Glencore for new car plants
Tesla Inc. will buy cobalt from from Glencore Plc, the world’s biggest miner of the metal, as the carmaker looks to avoid a future supply squeeze on the key battery metal, a person familiar with the matter said.The contract will help Tesla shore up its cobalt supply for new plants in China and Germany, said the person,..